A-share Three Major Indices Diverge at Midday Break, Power Stocks Fall
Anthropic’s sudden call for all staff to halt AI research landed like a bomb thrown into the tech world’s afternoon coffee. On one side, A-share electricity stocks are tumbling, and semiconductor sectors are plummeting; on the other, an AI giant is internally calling for a stop—as if the entire tech universe is splitting into two parallel worlds: one panicking over short-term volatility, the other trembling at long-term risks.
Analysis
Anthropic’s sudden call for all staff to halt AI research landed like a bomb thrown into the tech world’s afternoon coffee. On one side, A-share electricity stocks are tumbling, and semiconductor sectors are plummeting; on the other, an AI giant is internally calling for a stop—as if the entire tech universe is splitting into two parallel worlds: one panicking over short-term volatility, the other trembling at long-term risks.
Anthropic slammed the brakes hard. In today’s white-hot AI arms race, a company known for “responsible AI” jumping out to call for a halt suggests either they’ve genuinely seen firelight at the cliff’s edge or they’re playing a clever hand of expectation management. I suspect it’s a bit of both. Look at their competitors’ moves: Apple’s Vision Pro product line has been sidelined, while Jensen Huang jets off to appear on variety shows—the scene is almost surreal, with some bracing for crisis in labs while others chat and laugh on camera. The AI industry is上演一场荒诞剧: top scientists are worried about human extinction, while business leaders are busy crafting new narratives for investors.
News of DeepSeek charging for its services arrives at a fitting moment. The free model has nurtured how many bloated AI apps? Charging is a rite of passage, forcing users to ask, “Is this thing actually worth paying for?” But pricing could also kill innovation: when every token comes with a price tag, will those imaginative open-source projects starve in their cradles? This reminds me of today’s plunge in electricity stocks—tech evolution is never linear growth; there are always sectors that collapse amid the revelry, and new forces that rise from the ruins.
Cold data on Honda’s sales halving in China lies there alongside AI news. Traditional auto giants are crashing hard, while headlines on intelligent driving are all about algorithm breakthroughs. The contrast is glaring: Are we using AI’s revelry to mask the pains of the real economy? When analysts talk up “ByteDance AI’s four key propositions,” workers on the assembly line might be more concerned about next month’s paycheck. If technological progress stays confined to papers and PR releases, how is it different from the K-line charts of electricity stocks—numbers rise and fall, but life goes on.
Fei-Fei Li personally stepped forward to debunk the “world model” narrative—a stance that itself is sharp. When academic heavyweights have to debunk hype themselves, it shows the AI hype balloon has inflated even experts can’t stand it. Are we championing genuine breakthroughs, or collectively indulging in a sci-fi narrative? Look at those funding announcements: “Zhiwei Chuangxin” completes its angel round, claiming to boost development efficiency tenfold—a number as tempting as a gym poster promising “abs in three days.” Chip verification automation is a solid direction, but the industry is flooded with too many “10x efficiency” myths; when they finally land, they often become “10x the price.”
Jensen Huang’s reported distress over ByteDance using Arm CPUs—how much of that is genuine emotion versus PR? The battle over chip architectures isn’t just technical; it’s a microcosm of geopolitics. As Chinese companies pick sides, U.S. chip giants may appear saddened on the surface, but inwardly could be delighted—the fiercer the competition, the deeper their moat. But who’s most awkwardly caught in this game? The application-layer companies stuck in the middle, juggling tech blockades while catering to increasingly picky users.
Should AI research stop? The question itself is a luxury. Anthropic can call for a halt because they have the capital to pause and reflect; but tens of thousands of startups worldwide can’t afford to stop—they’re burning investor cash, sprinting through a jungle of “innovate or die.” We miss the era of pure technical breakthroughs, but today’s AI track is already tangled with capital games, geopolitical jockeying, and human greed. Electricity stocks are down, semiconductors are in the red, AI news is flooding the feed—all mixed together like the schizophrenia of our time: fearing the future while overdrawing on the present.
Perhaps the real warning isn’t Anthropic’s call, but our attitude toward technology: we’re forever swerving between “accelerate” and “brake,” forgetting to fasten our seatbelts. As Honda’s sales figures stand like tombstones and AI papers pile into mountains, maybe someone should ask: What kind of future are we sprinting toward? Don’t tell me it’s all about “improving efficiency”—today’s electricity stocks have already shown us: speed without direction only leads us faster into the wall.
Disclaimer: The above content is generated by AI and is for reference only.