CC-AOS: Cost- and Horizon-Conditioned Amortized Backward Induction for Finite-Horizon Optimal Stopping
CC-AOS introduces a structured amortized solver for finite-horizon optimal stopping problems that handles continuous costs and multiple horizons jointly. The method learns a shared continuation-value model conditioned on state, time, horizon, and cost using joint amortized fitted backward induction. It encodes theoretical properties (nondecreasing, concave, horizon-dependent Lipschitz in cost) into the architecture and derives residual-based error bounds. Experiments show CC-AOS outperforms per-
Analysis
TL;DR
- CC-AOS introduces a structured amortized solver for finite-horizon optimal stopping problems that handles continuous costs and multiple horizons jointly.
- The method learns a shared continuation-value model conditioned on state, time, horizon, and cost using joint amortized fitted backward induction.
- It encodes theoretical properties (nondecreasing, concave, horizon-dependent Lipschitz in cost) into the architecture and derives residual-based error bounds.
- Experiments show CC-AOS outperforms per-operating-point solvers on unseen cost-horizon pairs with 15.75% average reduction in terminal-risk-plus-sampling-cost objective on FordA benchmark.
Why It Matters
This work addresses a critical inefficiency in sequential decision-making systems where operating conditions (costs, horizons) change dynamically—eliminating the need to retrain separate models for each configuration. For AI practitioners building real-time monitoring or diagnostic systems (e.g., predictive maintenance, medical sensing), CC-AOS enables adaptive stopping policies without costly reoptimization, directly impacting deployment scalability and operational cost efficiency.
Technical Details
- Architecture: A single neural network takes as input current state $x_t$, absolute time $t$, remaining horizon $H-t$, and acquisition cost $c$, outputting continuation value $V(x_t, t, H-c)$; trained via amortized backward induction over simulated trajectories.
- Theoretical Constraints: Enforces monotonicity and concavity in cost through parameterization (e.g., using log-concave transformations) and imposes Lipschitz continuity w.r.t. cost with horizon-dependent bounds derived from Bellman operator properties.
- Training Objective: Minimizes residual loss between predicted and target continuation values computed via dynamic programming on sampled paths, regularized by constraint violations to preserve structural guarantees.
- Evaluation Benchmarks: Tested on synthetic Gaussian processes with known optima, non-Gaussian time-varying processes mimicking sensor drift, and FordA engine vibration dataset for early fault detection under varying inspection costs and deadlines.
- Performance Metric: Terminal risk (classification error at final step) plus cumulative sampling cost; CC-AOS achieves Pareto dominance over static thresholds and per-point solvers across six unseen $(c,H)$ pairs.
Industry Insight
Organizations deploying time-series classification systems should adopt amortized frameworks like CC-AOS to decouple policy learning from operational parameters—reducing MLOps overhead when cost structures evolve (e.g., due to hardware upgrades or regulatory changes). This approach also facilitates safer deployment in high-stakes domains (healthcare, industrial IoT) by providing certified error bounds on suboptimality, enabling auditable trade-offs between accuracy and resource expenditure. Future implementations could integrate CC-AOS with online learning to adapt to drifting data distributions while preserving structural guarantees.
Disclaimer: The above content is generated by AI and is for reference only.