AI Security AI安全 3h ago Updated 1h ago 更新于 1小时前 41

Decades-Old BMC Vulnerability Exposes Thousands of Data Centers to Attacks 数十年历史的BMC漏洞使数千个数据中心面临攻击风险

CVE-2013-4786 is a 22-year-old vulnerability in the IPMI 2.0 authentication protocol that allows offline password hash recovery from Baseboard Management Controllers Nearly 37,000 internet-exposed IPMI interfaces were found, with over 24,000 disclosing password-derived authentication hashes before login BMCs represent some of the most privileged control points in data centers, enabling power-cycling, firmware updates, and low-level platform configuration 6,240 hosts accepted empty usernames with 数据中心BMC管理处理器存在22年历史的CVE-2013-4786漏洞,可能导致数千个数据中心面临入侵风险 约37,000个暴露在互联网上的IPMI接口中,超过24,000个在登录前泄露密码哈希,可被离线破解 BMC作为数据中心最高权限控制点,其管理接口(IPMI/Redfish/Web)通常共享用户数据库,单一凭证泄露可横向渗透 攻击者利用漏洞可绕过在线认证限制,通过GPU加速离线破解弱密码、默认密码或工厂预设密码 该漏洞暴露了数据中心管理平面长期存在的安全盲区,BMC往往缺乏与受管系统同等强度的监控防护

58
Hot 热度
62
Quality 质量
55
Impact 影响力

Analysis 深度分析

TL;DR

  • CVE-2013-4786 is a 22-year-old vulnerability in the IPMI 2.0 authentication protocol that allows offline password hash recovery from Baseboard Management Controllers
  • Nearly 37,000 internet-exposed IPMI interfaces were found, with over 24,000 disclosing password-derived authentication hashes before login
  • BMCs represent some of the most privileged control points in data centers, enabling power-cycling, firmware updates, and low-level platform configuration
  • 6,240 hosts accepted empty usernames with weak passwords, and 2,340 had named accounts (Admin/root) using commonly found passwords
  • The shared user database across IPMI, Redfish, and web interfaces means compromising one surface can grant access to all

Why It Matters

This vulnerability exposes a critical blind spot in data center security: management processors that control critical infrastructure are often far less protected than the systems they manage. With modern GPU cracking capabilities and widespread use of predictable factory-issued passwords, a single exposed BMC can become a privileged, difficult-to-detect foothold across an entire management network.

Technical Details

  • CVE-2013-4786 exploits the IPMI 2.0 Remote Authentication and Key Privacy (RAKP) protocol, where the BMC returns an HMAC-SHA1 authentication code calculated using the account password and known session values, enabling offline brute-force attacks via UDP port 623
  • BMCs provide out-of-band management through multiple surfaces: IPMI protocol, Redfish HTTPS-based API, and web-based administrative interfaces, often sharing the same user database
  • Attackers can obtain password hashes without sending a new request per password candidate, making offline cracking significantly more efficient than repeated online login attempts
  • Lava's scan identified 37,000 internet-exposed IPMI interfaces, with 24,000+ disclosing pre-login authentication hashes and thousands using weak or default credentials

Industry Insight

  • Organizations should immediately audit their IPMI/BMC exposure, restrict UDP port 623 from public access, and enforce strong, unique passwords on all management interfaces
  • The shared credential model across IPMI, Redfish, and web UIs means security teams must treat BMC compromise as a full infrastructure takeover risk, not an isolated management plane issue
  • Legacy protocols like IPMI 2.0 remain dangerously prevalent; organizations should prioritize migrating to more secure management frameworks and implementing network-level segmentation for out-of-band management traffic

TL;DR

  • 数据中心BMC管理处理器存在22年历史的CVE-2013-4786漏洞,可能导致数千个数据中心面临入侵风险
  • 约37,000个暴露在互联网上的IPMI接口中,超过24,000个在登录前泄露密码哈希,可被离线破解
  • BMC作为数据中心最高权限控制点,其管理接口(IPMI/Redfish/Web)通常共享用户数据库,单一凭证泄露可横向渗透
  • 攻击者利用漏洞可绕过在线认证限制,通过GPU加速离线破解弱密码、默认密码或工厂预设密码
  • 该漏洞暴露了数据中心管理平面长期存在的安全盲区,BMC往往缺乏与受管系统同等强度的监控防护

为什么值得看

该漏洞揭示了数据中心基础设施层的安全薄弱环节,BMC作为带外管理核心组件,其安全性直接影响整个数据中心的访问控制体系。对于AI从业者而言,理解这一漏洞有助于在部署GPU集群和高性能计算环境时,重视底层管理平面的安全防护。

技术解析

  • 核心漏洞机制:CVE-2013-4786源于2004年IPMI 2.0认证协议设计缺陷,攻击者可通过UDP 623端口获取BMC返回的HMAC-SHA1认证码(基于账户密码和已知会话值计算),实现离线密码破解而无需重复在线尝试
  • 接口共享风险:多数BMC实现中IPMI、Redfish HTTPS API和Web管理界面共享同一用户数据库,IPMI凭证泄露可直接用于访问其他管理面
  • 暴露规模:Lava安全公司发现约37,000个互联网暴露的IPMI接口,其中24,000+个在登录前泄露密码派生认证哈希
  • 弱密码现状:6,240个主机接受空用户名配合弱密码,2,340个使用Admin/root等命名账户配合常见弱密码,部分BMC采用可预测的工厂预设密码格式
  • 攻击路径:未认证远程攻击者获取RAKP消息2响应中的HMAC值后,结合现代GPU算力可高效破解弱密码,获得BMC高权限访问

行业启示

  • 管理平面安全需提升优先级:BMC控制关键基础设施但长期缺乏足够监控保护,数据中心应建立独立的管理网络隔离带,对BMC接口实施严格访问控制和持续监控
  • 密码策略强制升级:立即审计所有暴露的BMC接口,强制禁用弱密码、默认密码和可预测格式密码,实施多因素认证和定期密码轮换机制
  • 供应链安全审查:厂商应修复IPMI 2.0协议设计缺陷,数据中心在采购服务器时需评估BMC固件安全更新支持和漏洞响应能力

Disclaimer: The above content is generated by AI and is for reference only. 免责声明:以上内容由 AI 生成,仅供参考。

Security 安全